[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DMCA Alternatives
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: DMCA Alternatives
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:00:34 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There will always be some difficult conflicts between the rights of the creators to credit (both intellectual and financial) and the rights of the public to access. Generally, the conventional legal approach that has been evolved provides an adequate balance. When the interests are really irreconcilable, then I know where I stand: If in doubt, the right of the public to access is always more important. There's a reason for this: the attempt to deny access under plausible but specious pretexts is a well-tested instrument of totalitarian oppression. Anyone who does not recognize this as a current danger should perhaps be paying more attention to world events. As Rick says, > > Free as in freedom. Information is inherently the common > > wealth of humanity, the moment it's communicated. There's > > actually no two ways about that. For those who may think > > it's hard to know where to start with this then I recommend starting with chapter 2 of John Stuart Mill's On Liberty. Dr. David Goodman Research Librarian and Biological Science Bibliographer Princeton University Library Princeton, NJ 08544-0001 phone: 609-258-7785 fax: 609-258-2627 e-mail: dgoodman@princeton.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Hoover's
- Next by Date: For the record (RE: DMCA Alternatives)
- Prev by thread: RE: DMCA Alternatives
- Next by thread: censoring films
- Index(es):