[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: DMCA Alternatives
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <seth.johnson@realmeasures.dyndns.org>
- Subject: RE: DMCA Alternatives
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:53:43 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Information is free, both intrinsically and as a matter > of established jurisprudence, wherein the distinction between facts and > expression has consistently been upheld. In what meaningful sense is information "free," given that it exists only as the result of human labor? I would argue to the contrary -- that information is invariably costly, and that the rights of those who labor to create it can certainly be ignored, but do not disappear simply because someone chooses to ignore them. The same is true of costs -- you can shift them, but you can't make them go away. If information exists, someone has paid for it either directly or indirectly. (And what exactly is the "established jurisprudence" to which you refer? Can a legal opinion make information come into existence magically, without the investment of human labor? If it can't, then how can it make information "free"?) > > which it does by making it possible for authors and artists > > to profit from their work. Give people a financial > > incentive to create information, and you'll tend to get > > more information. Once it's created, you have to find a > > healthy balance between spreading that information around > > (which is both necessary and desirable, of course) and > > preserving the financial incentive to create. A system that > > only honors one side of that balance will fail. > > This way of looking at the issue is sure to mislead us, since it > emphasizes a statutory principle over more essential ones. I'm not a very smart person, so I confess that I find this statement confusing. Balancing the incentive to create information with the rights of information users "will surely mislead us"? How does such balance necessitate an undue focus on statute? Can't it simply imply a healthy recognition that people should be able to profit from their work (even when that work involves the creation of information) and that people should also have reasonable fair use rights? ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "I'm not against the modern 1664 No. Virginia St. world. I just don't think Reno, NV 89557 everything's for sale." PH (775) 784-6500 x273 -- Elvis Costello FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Version 44, Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography
- Next by Date: L'Annee Philologique - Contact?
- Prev by thread: RE: DMCA Alternatives
- Next by thread: Re: DMCA Alternatives
- Index(es):