[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: L'Annee Philologique (fwd)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: L'Annee Philologique (fwd)
- From: anthony.watkinson@btinternet.com
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 17:38:02 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
With all due respect to Andrew, although he is absolutely correct in what he says, surely the only practical position to take is to remain silent about the place of jurisdiction. We all know that legal action is very unlikely indeed. > from: "Braid, Andrew" <Andrew.Braid@bl.uk> > date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 20:50:48 > to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > subject: RE: L'Annee Philologique (fwd) > > Remaining silent may not solve the issue. See details of the Hague > Conference on Private International Law (of which both France and the US > are signatories) http://www.hcch.net/e/conventions/text31e.html#ch2 On my > reading there are circumstances in which French law could prevail. > > Andrew Braid Licensing & Copyright Compliance Manger > The British Library, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ, UK > Tel 44 (0)1937 546030 > Email andrew.braid@bl.uk
- Prev by Date: RE: L'Annee Philologique (fwd)
- Next by Date: L'annee philologique
- Prev by thread: RE: L'Annee Philologique (fwd)
- Next by thread: RE: L'Annee Philologique (fwd)
- Index(es):