[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Call for input on digital rights management
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Call for input on digital rights management
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:22:14 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This thread on diglib may be of interest to many readers of liblicense-l. If this topic interests you, please make your views known to members of the working party. With thanks to Patrick Durusau and Robin Cover. *** Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:08:51 -0400 From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu> <w.mccarty@btinternet.com>)" <willard@lists.village.virginia.edu> Subject: Re: 16.102 call for input on digital rights management Greetings, I deeply appreciate Robin Cover's post to the list requesting DRM requirements and would urge the academic community to response appropriately, even given the rather short deadline for requirements (7 August 2002). In terms of deciding to devote summer hours to this task, please consider the membership of this TC: Hari Reddy, Chairperson ContentGuard Carlisle Adams, Entrust Bob Atkinson, Microsoft Thomas DeMartini, ContentGuard John Erickson, H.P. Brad Gandee, Secretary ContentGuard Bob Glushko, CommerceOne Thomas Hardjono, Verisign Hal Lockhart, Entegrity M. Paramasivam, Microsoft David Parrott, Reuters Harry Piccariello, ContentGuard Peter Schirling, IBM Xin Wang, ContentGuard While I am sure all the members of the TC will try to develop a standard that represents the interests of everyone affected by the DRM standard, I fail to see any representation of the academic, library or other communities. That is not to imply any fault on the part of the TC or OASIS, as a community academics have tended to absent themselves from such discussions. The interests of the academic community in issues such as "fair use" and allowing free (or at least non-commercial) use of texts and research will not be well served by a standard that protects the commercial rights in the "Lion King" and similar artifacts. Our requirements are different and any standard for DRM should not attempt a one size fits all solution. I am sure that the TC would welcome academic input that would lead to a more nuanced standard that meets a wide range of needs, one of the hallmarks of a successful standard. Note that a DRM standard will eventually find its way into hardware/software and it will be too late to complain at that point that it does not meet the needs of the academic community. Please forward Robin's note (and my comments if you think appropriate) to anyone you know who is interested in "fair use" or more generally access to academic materials, since a DRM standard will deeply affect both issues. Patrick Durusau Director of Research and Development Society of Biblical Literature pdurusau@emory.edu *** > Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 06:40:20 +0100 > From: Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com> > Subject: Request for DRM Requirements > > An OASIS Rights Language Technical Committee [1] has been > established to "define the industry standard for a rights > language" that would govern many application domains, > including (potentially) digital libraries and archive > projects. The TC has is using an XrML markup language > specification from ContentGuard (Xerox and Microsoft) > as the basis for defining this common standard. > > Requirements are now being collected as input to the > standard's design. A request is hereby made for input > from the academic community, (digital) libraries, > museums, archive centers [etc], including persons > affiliated with ALA or RLG. The relevant OASIS > subcommittee will collect requirements through > August 7, 2002. > > Current legislative proposals for incorporating > DRM technology and usage policies into computer > hardware, operating system software, and applications > level software raise the stakes for the humanities > community, especially as traditional notions of fair > use are being challenged as too burdensome to > implement in DRM systems. The Creative Commons > Project [2] exemplifies the attempt of one group > to counter this trend, but the effects of a > government-mandated universal DRM technology are > of concern to a growing number of technologists [3]. > > Any interested party having access to DRM specifications > or implementations, or otherwise motivated to help > in the submission of 'rights management' requirements for > humanities computing applications is invited to send email > expressing this interest. > > Robin Cover > robin@isogen.com > > [1] http://xml.coverpages.org/oasisRightsLanguage.html > [2] http://www.creativecommons.org/ > [3] http://xml.coverpages.org/patents.html _____________________________________________________________________ To post messages to DIGLIB, send messages to: diglib@infoserv.inist.fr To manage your account, change subscription options, or visit the archive: http://infoserv.inist.fr/wwsympa.fcgi/info/diglib DIGLIB requires that subscribers login with a password to change their list profiles. First time users can request a password from the page above. Any questions can be directed to the list moderator at: terry.kuny@xist.com _____________________________________________________________________
- Prev by Date: L'Annee Philologique
- Next by Date: Re: L'Annee Philologique
- Prev by thread: Re: Liblicense Feedback - Sage Publications
- Next by thread: RE: Call for input on digital rights management
- Index(es):