[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Music companys to pay up
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Music companys to pay up
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 00:40:00 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I note that the Congressional committee reports on section 107 include the following: "although the couts have considered...the doctrine of fair use over and over again, no real definition of the concept has ever emerged, Indeed, since the doctrine is an equitable rule of reason, no generaly applicable definition is possible, and each case must be decided on its own merits." and the text of the statute includes the wonderfully vague phrase "the factors to be considered shall include..." David Goodman Research Librarian and Biological Sciences Bibliographer Princeton University Library dgoodman@princeton.edu 609-258-7785 On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, CAMPBELL wrote: ... > > Fair use is a matter of statute, not equity, and the ethical standards of > a particular vendor really don't come into it. > ...
- Prev by Date: Position Vacancy
- Next by Date: News from Mike Spinella
- Prev by thread: RE: Music companys to pay up
- Next by thread: Judge to review UnCover settlement files
- Index(es):