[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Music companys to pay up
- To: "Liblicense-L (E-mail)" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Music companys to pay up
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 23:50:41 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/music/newsid_2066000/2066858. stm More than 150 veteran music stars and their heirs will share a $4.75m (�3.1m) payout after a judge ruled that a deal on decades of unpaid royalties was fair. The campaign to be paid by music giant Universal had been led by jazz legend Peggy Lee, who died in January ... The 161 stars and their heirs alleged they were owed millions of dollars after the record company under-reported sales figures and over-charged them for services such as album packaging. snip The deal was a watershed for the music industry because it showed that even retired or deceased artists could not be ignored by record labels, Mr Godfrey said. snip Many of the artists signed contract amendments in the 1980s for the sale of CDs as the format took off, but the court papers said Universal did not keep to the terms of those agreements. My Comment- looks like the music companies have a terrible record of paying what they owe -and this case showed they cooked the books, overcharging for "packaging" of albums, under counting of fees owed performers /undereporting sales. Is this the industry that claims everyone else is cheating them??? Just exactly who does congress think it is dealing with anyway? Why did congress believe the claims of an industry that behaves like it claims its customers behave? Chuck
- Prev by Date: RE: license jurisdiction related to pricing
- Next by Date: a no notes policy
- Prev by thread: a no notes policy
- Next by thread: RE: Music companys to pay up
- Index(es):