[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: meaning of "systematic"
- To: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: RE: meaning of "systematic"
- From: "Behney, Melissa A. (Information Services)" <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:09:42 EDT
- Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sender: email@example.com
It's my understanding from a conversation with a publisher rep. that there had been instances on university campuses where students, particularly international students, were downloading entire journal archives, taking the electronic version out of the country, and selling them. This is probably an extreme case but I can understand a publisher's/vendor's concerns on this point. Melissa Behney Research and Instruction Librarian Charles E. Shain Library Connecticut College 270 Mohegan Avenue New London, CT 06320 (860)439-2444 e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org -----Original Message----- From: Carole Richter [mailto:Carole.J.Richter.email@example.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:22 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com Subject: RE: meaning of "systematic" I understand JSTOR and IEEE both to mean that users cannot download issue after issue in their entirety. That seemed perfectly logical to me, even if a bit of a gray area to define precisely. But another colleague then asked why!!! And I found that I had no real answer! I suppose if we get the journal in print, a faculty member or student CAN make personal copies of every single article if they want to, can't they? Sorry to sound naive, but the more I thought about it, the less sure I was that the publisher has hard ground here. Of course it seems a little greedy and aggressive to download and print reams of paper...the issue or more...but are we really able to police that? If I'm way out on a limb here, I'm sure everyone will jump in to saw it off very quickly! Carole Richter Pilkinton Electronic Resources Librarian University of Notre Dame Libraries (574) 631-8405 firstname.lastname@example.org At 11:41 PM 6/1/02 -0400, Rick Anderson wrote: > > Have you any views, or can you refer me to any authoritative > > interpretation of "systematic" in this context? > >I would suggest that your mistake was in asking the publisher to interpret >the language for you. Instead, I think you should have let the ambiguity >work in your favor -- come to a good-faith understanding, within your >institution, of what "systematic" means, and then abide by it. "Good >faith" is essential -- I'm not suggesting that you should use ambiguity as >an excuse to take undue liberty. But you can be sure that if you ask the >publisher to intepret the terms of the license, the interpretation given >will be strict. And then you're stuck with a documented exchange. > >------------- >Rick Anderson >email@example.com
- Prev by Date: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by Date: Finally hitting the core question (RE: DMCA alternatives)
- Prev by thread: Re: meaning of "systematic"