[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 18:27:18 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Now, if JD Sallinger were to have written me the letter in code, and not > told me the code, I would be in the position of owning the paper and the > ink, but still be unable to read it. However, if I were to figure out the > code on my own, I could read it. If it were subject to the DMCA, I would > not have the right to figure out the code. Right, and as I think we all agree, that's a big problem with the DMCA. But that's only half the question. Here's the other half: Suppose _you_ own the copyright to the letter. Does that give you the right to encode it yourself so that others cannot access it? If not, then this whole issue is moot. But if so, then one thing the DMCA does is protect you from those who would decode it without your permission. Is that protection a good thing? If not, why not? ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "I'm not against the modern 1664 No. Virginia St. world. I just don't think Reno, NV 89557 everything's for sale." PH (775) 784-6500 x273 FX (775) 784-1328 -- Elvis Costello rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: meaning of "systematic"
- Next by Date: RE: DMCA alternatives
- Prev by thread: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by thread: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Index(es):