[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- From: "Laurie Urquiaga" <Urquiagal@lawgate.byu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 16:56:45 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Actually, Rick, I think Chuck would find this to be a better analogy: I buy a house, but it turns out that the automatic garage door opener is only configured to work for American-made automobiles. Should it be a crime for me to bypass the door control mechanism so that I can park my BMW (yeah, right :-) in the garage of the house that *I* ostensibly own? What if I help my neighbor bypass her garage control as well? And then if I post the procedure on the internet, well ...? Does the analysis change if the seller has a line in the fine print of the purchase agreement that says "buyer will honor the garage exclusivity rule" but the exclusivity rule itself is locked inside the garage and I can't see it until after the purchase is complete? The reason your house analogy doesn't feel right is that when a person buys a digital product, they usually believe they've purchased *something more* than the blank media (or else they'd just buy the blank media for a lot less money). What isn't clear in any aspect of the transaction, either commercially or legally, is exactly what that something more actually is. My sense is that most consumers think they've bought a copy of a song or whatever and that they have a right to use it in any reasonable way and that nobody should be able to lock those uses away. (Close to my analogy of buying a house, with copy protection being a 'defective' garage.) But most content owners seem to be arguing that the buyer owns only the physical object as if it were blank, and nothing recorded on the object belongs to the purchaser (closer to your analogy of someone breaking into your house or maybe more like you granting me title to the siding but claiming that the frame and furnishings belong to you, so I only get to view the house from the outside). Where, in the vast middle ground between those views, does the line properly belong? Laureen C. Urquiaga Associate Director for Access Services Law School Copyright Coordinator urquiagal@lawgate.byu.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: DMCA alternatives (RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" IsGetting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by Date: Re: Negotiating
- Prev by thread: Re: Negotiating
- Next by thread: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Index(es):