[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- From: "Peter Picerno" <ppicerno@nova.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 13:54:48 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
One addition or correction to the excellent point below: in the electronic world one does not "buy" anything: one (or one's institution) is allowed access (and allowed or not allowed certain other functions) based on a leasing arrangement: just like with concrete property, one can live in a leased building but one may not make changes or do certain things at the will of the owner whereas when one owns concrete property, there are certain rights of ownership such as changing the structure, willing it to another party, etc., which are tacit with ownership. While one does not 'own' intellectual property, ownership of the 'container' certainly (at least at this point in time) grants many more freedoms than leasing the access medium does. Dr. Peter V. Picerno Acquisitions and Serials Librarian Nova Southeastern University Libraries 3301 College Avenue Fort Lauderdale FL 33314 (954) 262-4662 FAX (954) 262-3946 -----Original Message----- J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:46 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment) Well: if you buy a copy of a book, you can keep it indefinitely; you can lend it to a friend; you can give it away; you can leave it to someone in your will; or you can sell it to a second-hand bookseller. If you "buy" an electronic information product, how many of those things can you do before the publisher says you are breaking copyright? Fytton Rowland, Dept of Information Science, Loughborough University, UK. Quoting Rick Anderson <rickand@unr.edu>: > A point of clarification: > > > Two recent federal court rulings in Hollywood's favor could undermine > > consumers' historical rights to use the content they buy > > Actually, these rulings threaten to undermine consumers' historical > rights to use content they do _not_ buy. There's a big difference > between buying a copy of, say, a book (which is generally what consumers > do) and buyin the content of a book (which is generally what publishers > do). Fair use is about using content owned by others. > > ------------- > Rick Anderson > rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Trial set for DMCA case
- Next by Date: Scholars Rally Behind Online Publisher
- Prev by thread: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Next by thread: RE: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Index(es):