[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 00:11:55 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
A point of clarification: > Two recent federal court rulings in Hollywood's favor could undermine > consumers' historical rights to use the content they buy Actually, these rulings threaten to undermine consumers' historical rights to use content they do _not_ buy. There's a big difference between buying a copy of, say, a book (which is generally what consumers do) and buying the content of a book (which is generally what publishers do). Fair use is about using content owned by others. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "That wasn't a Freudian slip; 1664 No. Virginia St. it was a Jungian slip." Reno, NV 89557 -- Dr. Katz PH (775) 784-6500 x273 FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: MARGINALISATION OF THE LIBRARY
- Next by Date: RE: MARGINALISATION OF THE LIBRARY
- Prev by thread: No Subject
- Next by thread: Re: Clarification (RE: "Fair Use" Is Getting Unfair Treatment)
- Index(es):