[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Librarians
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Librarians
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:13:08 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Providing subject and author access (otherwise known as metadata) is a way > of doing it, and we have learned that it must be done in a very > sophisticated way to do much good. Neither the libraries' traditional > devices nor the current web devices do well for this, except in the hands > of a really experienced user, which in practice usually means a librarian. This, I think, is the irony of our current position with our users. Our methods of providing access are insufficiently sophisticated, and therefore require more sophistication from our users than they generally have. Our traditional response is bibliographic instruction, and that's why our users are avoiding us. If we're going to stay relevant (or, perhaps more accurately, become relevant) to library users, we're going to have to stop trying to change the way they use information, and instead figure out how they use information and change what _we_ do. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "All Reviews in the world 1664 No. Virginia St. begin with the intention Reno, NV 89557 of being virtuous. None PH (775) 784-6500 x273 have been." FX (775) 784-1328 -- Gustave Flaubert rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: ARL Advanced Licensing Workshop
- Next by Date: Elsevier Offers Electronic-Only Option for Journal Subscriptions
- Prev by thread: Librarians
- Next by thread: licensing terms for 1Cate
- Index(es):