[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Knight Roundtable Promotes Digital Publications in the Humanitiesand Social Sciences
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Knight Roundtable Promotes Digital Publications in the Humanitiesand Social Sciences
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:39:36 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Of possible interest to readers of liblicense-l. The Moderators ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:03:18 -0500 From: Judith Matz <judith@arl.org> Subject: Knight Roundtable Promotes Digital Publications in the Humanities and Social Sciences FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 15, 2002 For further information please contact: Judith Matz <judith@arl.org>� Communications Officer, ARL KNIGHT ROUNDTABLE PROMOTES DIGITAL PUBLICATIONS IN THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Washington, DC -- The attention given recently to the soaring costs of scholarly publications has focused almost exclusively on the scientific, technical, and medical fields. But what about scholars in the humanities and social sciences who also suffer from the rising expense of disseminating research findings? With the increase in federal and university dollars to support research in science, technology, and medicine, the share of funding available for the social sciences and humanities has declined. The resulting loss of subsidies for publishing in the humanities and social sciences, along with the decline in sales of books to libraries as they struggle to keep up with the exploding numbers and excessive prices of science journals, have led to the disappearance of venues in which to publish specialized scholarship. In March 2001, the Association of Research Libraries, the National Humanities Alliance, and the Knight Collaborative, with support from the National Endowment for the Humanities, convened the Roundtable on Scholarly Communication in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Participants representing faculty, administrators, scholarly societies, scholarly publishers, and librarians, considered the future of disseminating scholarly findings in the humanities and social sciences. The final report of the roundtable was issued in December in the form of an essay, "Op. Cit." Roundtable participants acknowledged the differences in scholarly exchange between those who consider the library��as opposed to the laboratory��their home. Yet, "the primary values that scholars in the humanities and social sciences seek to uphold are not dramatically different from those of other academic disciplines." Essentially academic communities seek to provide access to scholarly works, a means of conferring qualitative evaluation and judgment of the scholarship, and an efficient way to disseminate scholarly findings. Thus, the roundtable concluded, a thoughtful and concerted effort to develop the digital medium as a venue of publication can help to achieve each of these purposes in the humanities and social sciences, no less than in the scientific fields. In addition, digital publication offers the potential to attract both a broader audience and increased support to scholarly exploration in the humanities and social sciences. "We believe," the essay concludes, in "an inventive exploration of the possibilities of digital publication��both as an augmentation to and, at times, a substitute for print publication." Members of the roundtable recognized that scholars might be reluctant to adopt electronic publishing if it jeopardizes their chances for promotion and tenure. Scholars need assurances that scholarly work addressed to a broader audience and peer-reviewed research published in electronic form will be considered legitimate forms of scholarly activity. To accelerate the cultural shifts needed for acceptance of electronic publishing, universities and colleges should establish policies declaring peer-reviewed electronic publications comparable to peer-reviewed print publications for consideration in promotion and tenure decisions. Moreover, scholarly societies should take a leadership role in developing systems of evaluation for the new genres of scholarly works that are being published digitally. Roundtable participants also noted that scholars need scholarly publishers, institutions, and libraries to work together with them to provide the infrastructure, expertise, and financial resources necessary for electronic publishing. Active and continuing partnerships and the willingness of stakeholders to explore new economic models are critical to this effort. The March roundtable "grew out of a series of conversations that have taken place in conferences, roundtables, and National Humanities Alliance committee discussions over the past several years," notes Duane Webster, Executive Director of the Association of Research Libraries. "We hope the essay will encourage active discussion in the broader community and the development of innovative partnerships in electronic publishing." Individual copies of the essay, in the December 2001 issue of Policy Perspectives, can be obtained from the Institute for Research on Higher Education, University of Pennsylvania, 4200 Pine Street, 5A, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4090; phone 1-215-898-4585. The issue is available on the Web at <www.irhe.upenn.edu/pubs>. The Association of Research Libraries (ARL) is a not-for-profit membership organization comprising over 120 libraries of North American research institutions. Its mission is to shape and influence forces affecting the future of research libraries in the process of scholarly communication. ARL programs and services promote equitable access to, and effective use of recorded knowledge in support of teaching, research, scholarship, and community service. The Association articulates the concerns of research libraries and their institutions, forges coalitions, influences information policy development, and supports innovation and improvement in research library operations. ARL operates as a forum for the exchange of ideas and as an agent for collective action. The National Humanities Alliance (NHA) is a coalition of eighty-eight organizations concerned with federal programs that affect the humanities. The membership includes scholarly and professional societies; associations of museums, libraries, universities, state humanities councils; university-based and independent centers and institutes, and other groups with interests in the humanities. The mission of the NHA is to advance the cause of the humanities by promoting the common interests of its members with regard to national policy, programs, and legislation that affects the National Endowment for the Humanities and other agencies related to the humanities. The NHA is strictly nonpartisan. The Knight Higher Education Collaborative, sponsored by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, is a cooperative undertaking of colleges and universities that work together to understand the higher education market and how to shape it. The Higher Education Roundtable is one component of the Knight Higher Education Collaborative. The Roundtable seeks to foster an informed national dialogue on the challenges and opportunities facing American colleges and universities around the three central issues of cost, quality teaching and learning, and access�with particular emphasis on the market and its influence on educational policy and institutional practice. The Roundtable convenes both national conversations to focus on issues confronting all of higher education and on-campus conversations to facilitate the exploration of challenges facing specific institutions seeking strategies to thrive in an increasingly competitive market. National roundtables convene individuals known for their experience and leadership in particular aspects of higher education. A national roundtable culminates in an essay that appears in an issue of Policy Perspectives, the publication of the Knight Collaborative. ________________________________________ ARL-ANNOUNCE is a broadcast service from ARL that provides updates on Association activities, workshops, publications, and other items of interest to those in the library and educational communities. To subscribe, send a message to <listproc@arl.org>. The text of your message should read: "subscribe arl-announce [your name]." ____________________________________________ Judith Matz Communications Officer Association of Research Libraries 21 Dupont Circle, NW #800 Washington, DC 20036-1118 Phone 202-296-2296 Fax 202-872-0884 judith@arl.org www.arl.org
- Prev by Date: Librarians
- Next by Date: Elsevier Science endorses new ICOLC Guidelines for measuring e-journal usage
- Prev by thread: Elsevier Science endorses new ICOLC Guidelines for measuring e-journal usage
- Next by thread: Librarians
- Index(es):