[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BMJ Journals publishing-what are they doing!
- To: <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: BMJ Journals publishing-what are they doing!
- From: Tommy K�gner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:14:38 EST
- Reply-To: email@example.com
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
Basing the price of the online journals on the number of FTE seems to me to be a reasonably good way of pricing online journals. What must be debated though, is the definition of small, medium, large and extra large institutions. It seems as if the number of FTE for an "extra large institution" is set very low. How many of the academic institutions in the States and elsewhere have less than 4000 FTE? Has anyone checked the usage statistics for the BMJ journals? It would be very interesting to see what we're paying per downloaded article, but so far no statistics have been provided, at least not for us. Has any one else been able to get usage stats from BMJ? ********************************* Tommy K�gner Librarian Karolinska Institutet Library (http://kib.ki.se) Box 200 S-171 77 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 728 68 29 email@example.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Liblicense-L (E-mail)" <email@example.com> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:29 AM Subject: BMJ Journals publishing-what are they doing! > BMJ Publishing for 2002 has taken a strange turn: > > They have an "institutional print only" price, which they say is 3% above > last year. However last year's journals included electronic access I > believe. > > Electronic only is at a substantial premium above print only. For > example: British Journal of Sports Medicine is 205 pounds for > institutional print only $329 for U.S. Online only and online with print > is tiered, two ways. 1. by journal 2. for Academic institutions by FTE > i.e. Total number of medical faculty (academic staff and students) and > researchers. > > I will assume, since my institution does not have a medical school, that > UNC Charlotte would therefore fall in the "small" category for online or > online plus print. Online only for 1-400 FTE (at 37 hours a week) as > defined above, in Tier "two" journals, which Br J. Spt. Med falls under: > "small" institution 300 pounds (about a 46% premium over the print) or > $480!, a $151 about a 45% premium over print only. > > print and online for a small institution is $545-- 65%over the print! > > The premium is much larger for some institutions, going up to $895 online > only for "Extra large" institutions, ie. medical FTE 4001+and $960 for > online and print for "extra large" > > Thats extra large for sure! > > So no folks, this isn't a 3% increase. its something else. More like a 30% > plus run on library budgets. > > Take the time to figure out the pricing (and I think every institution > will have to, I can't imagine how subscription agencies can figure this!) > and where your institution fits, and which journals you have are in the > tier 1 or tier two price range for online or online plus print, Just > because we registered for their journals last year does NOT mean we want > to pay their outrageous tiered pricing this year. > > Its pretty shocking. I have, since the mid 1980's held BMJ publishing in > very high regard for their reaction to differential pricing. When Deana > Astle, Fred Ruschin and others pointed out what they were doing they moved > well in advance of other publishers to a single world wide rate.Now we are > back to such complex tiered pricing that I believe the library community > should speak up loudly about this approach. > > I fear they've gone back to their bad old ways and at the same time made > their e-journals unreachable for many. > > I suspect we need to start monitoring pricing again at the levels we were > doing in the 90's given all the really incredible schemes publishers seem > to be coming up with. To claim "low" increases while in fact making > outrageous increases, as the whole pricing scheme from BMJ turns out to be > seems an insult to the library community (which is very pleased-- they > tell us on their website, with their new institutionally tiered pricing) > > For their "print only" cost see: > http://www.bmjjournals.com/subscriptions/cost.shtml > > For their double tiering (i.e. instiutions, 4 tiers) and price "bands" > (two tiers) and definitions see: > http://www.bmjjournals.com/subscriptions/institutional.shtml and read down > the page. > > How are subscription agents handling BMJ prices for what can only be called > "matrix pricing"?? > > It takes a fair amount of work to figure out what's what. If it takes two > pages to explain it how is anyone going to figure it out? It looks like > they've abandoned reasonable pricing schemes in favor of a bizarre > approach. > > Given the enormous goodwill in the library community and medical community > they've engendered with BMJ free on the web, with their quick reaction in > the 80's on differential pricing why would they risk it with this kind of > approach? (p.s. they've been pretty consistent at using 1.6 for the > exchange rate for dollars-though I did not check every dollar/pound price. > > Chuck Hamaker > UNC Charlotte
- Prev by Date: Re: BMJ Journals publishing-what are they doing!
- Next by Date: RE: Library response to BioMed Central's new Institutional Membership Program
- Prev by thread: Re: BMJ Journals publishing-what are they doing!
- Next by thread: RE: BMJ Journals publishing-what are they doing!