[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PsycArticles License
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: PsycArticles License
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 19:14:54 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Here I have to disagree. I have seen this exact behaviour many times. I > have even been told that some students in a class will get together and > 'divvy up' the articles they need, acquire them through whatever means > (Libary, ILL, etc.), and make photocopies fr all the others. Then they > get to gether and pass them all out. I think this is especially common > for materials on course reserve. I'm not saying that students never photocopy for each other. I'm saying that publishers are not wrong in their apparent belief that e-copies are more likely to be copied and redistributed (and in much greater numbers) than print copies. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "All Reviews in the world 1664 No. Virginia St. begin with the intention Reno, NV 89557 of being virtuous. None PH (775) 784-6500 x273 have been." FX (775) 784-1328 -- Gustave Flaubert rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: PsycArticles License
- Next by Date: RE: PsycArticles License
- Prev by thread: RE: PsycArticles License
- Next by thread: RE: PsycArticles License
- Index(es):