[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PsycArticles License
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: PsycArticles License
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 15:41:09 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Then why do they sell electronic access at all? Because there's money to be made in selling it. > There's a whole lot more > opportunity for mass redistribution, if anyone wants to do that, by the > 1000s of users who have legit access to their own campus electronic > subscriptions, than via the relatively small number of ILL'd articles on > obviously scattered subjects. That's why they impose stringent license agreements that often say, among other things, that the library is responsible for any copyright infringement by its users and that the library will make sure its users understand what kinds of use are and are not allowed. Again, is this failsafe? No, but it's understandable. (That said, I never approve a license agreement that requires my institution to assume responsibility for our users' actions. But I can understand why publishers wish we would.) ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "All Reviews in the world 1664 No. Virginia St. begin with the intention Reno, NV 89557 of being virtuous. None PH (775) 784-6500 x273 have been." FX (775) 784-1328 -- Gustave Flaubert rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: FW: Dutch Court Orders Halt to Swapping of Copyright-Protected Files on KaZaA
- Next by Date: RE: PsycArticles License
- Prev by thread: Re: PsycArticles License
- Next by thread: RE: PsycArticles License
- Index(es):