[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PsycArticles License
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: PsycArticles License
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:20:03 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
At the risk of reigniting an old argument: > The only possible > reason for greater restrictions on ILL from e-journals than print was the > possibility of the copies multiplying due to the ease of reproduction. > Since a print article can be scanned and then multiplied similarly, this > distinction is obsolete. Not true. Send me an article as an e-mail attachment, and I can forward it to several thousand people in a matter of five mouseclicks and ten seconds. Fax or snail-mail the article to me and I'd have to go to the considerably greater effort of scanning, formatting and saving each page first. That's more than enough effort to prevent casual or accidental wholesale redistribution. No, it won't stop someone who is determined and highly motivated. But the question isn't whether print-only ILL policies are failsafe; the question is whether they erect a reasonable barrier that makes piracy less likely. We can argue about whether they do those things, but let's not pretend that the mass redistribution of print is as easy as the mass forwarding of e-mail. > What prevents copies being re-published in the > electronic era is the law abiding nature of librarians, who, if anything, > are too over-cautious to make full use of the rights they do have. I know > of no case where academic librarians have ever deliberately and > systematically violated copyright on a substantial scale for any material, > print or electronic, for text or other media. Publishers are not, I believe, worried that librarians are going to widely redistribute their materials. They're worried that end users will. By no means is this a foolish worry, especially if the end user is a Napster-minded undergrad who equates intellectual property with fascism. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "The only thing worse than a 1664 No. Virginia St. silly politician analyzing Reno, NV 89557 art is a silly artist PH (775) 784-6500 x273 analyzing politics." FX (775) 784-1328 -- Jonathan Alter rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Questia: A Company That Offers an Online Library Lays Off Half ItsEmployees
- Prev by thread: RE: PsycArticles License
- Next by thread: Re: digest 799
- Index(es):