[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NEJM
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: NEJM
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:02:48 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Now this one's a real money saver for libraries. . . cancel all those > expensive contracts with Ebsco, Proquest etc., and just tell patrons they > should subscribe individually to the electronic journals of their choice!! > Do we want to start down this road?? If publishers want to "act rationally > and maximize revenue" let's go this route and see if they can match the > revenues they get now from libraries!! I think many journal publishers would love to see us do this. They've never been thrilled by the idea of several thousand people getting the use of a single subscription. Imagine if my library gave up its single subcription to NEJM and the number of individual faculty subscriptions doubled as a result -- the MMS would be thrilled, of course, and should be. Actually, it wouldn't need to double; it would only need to increase by two for the publisher to realize a net gain. This is the essence of the tension between libraries and publishers. We want to give away what they want to sell. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "Beware the cynic as well as 1664 No. Virginia St. the huckster." Reno, NV 89557 -- Ted Marchese PH (775) 784-6500 x273 FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu