[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RLG 8/31/01 News Release: Digital Attributes Paper
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RLG 8/31/01 News Release: Digital Attributes Paper
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:08:45 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Of possible interest to many liblicense-l readers. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:01:45 -0700 From: Linda_West@notes.rlg.org To: RLG Services Discussion Forum <rlg-services-forum@lists2.rlg.org> Subject: [rlg-services-forum] RLG 8/31/01 News Release: Digital Attributes Paper This release can be consulted at: http://www.rlg.org/pr/pr2001-attributes.html Attributes of a Trusted Repository for Digital Materials: RLG and OCLC Release Paper for Comment For more information, contact Jennifer Hartzell (jlh@notes.rlg.org, +1-650-691-2207) or Nita Dean (nita_dean@oclc.org, +1-614-761-5002) Mountain View, California, August 31, 2001-- RLG has released the second report developed in collaboration with OCLC Online Computer Library Center to advance long-term retention of digital research materials. "Attributes of a Trusted Digital Repository: Meeting the Needs of Research Resources" is freely available as a PDF document from the RLG web site at <http://www.rlg.org/longterm/attributes01.pdf> and is linked to from <www.oclc.org/digitalpreservation> and <www.oclc.org/presres> This 52-page paper is intended to prompt consideration and discussion worldwide. Stakeholders in the effort to preserve digital materials are urged to read it and comment to Robin.Dale@notes.rlg.org by early October 2001. "I hope this will provide a framework and precipitate a debate for people to make declarations about archiving services that can be understood in a broad system context," said RLG president James Michalko. "Ultimately, I'd like to see the debate result in some small number of trusted, reliable service providers, whether they are research institutions themselves or third parties." "OCLC's collaboration with RLG and other leading institutions to explore digital preservation issues and share the findings will benefit libraries and their users around the world," said Jay Jordan, OCLC president and chief executive officer. "OCLC's digital archiving initiatives are guided by active participation in this working group and other key projects." Dialog is needed on the standards, criteria, and mechanisms for certifying digital information repositories, to help achieve an international consensus. The report is relevant to local, regional, national, and international efforts -- successful scholarship in the future will depend heavily on coordinated, interoperable digital archiving. While intended primarily for research institutions and specifically for libraries and archives, this report contains guidance and recommendations applicable to any organization interested in long-term maintenance of and continuing access to digital materials. It highlights some key strategic issues as it focuses on practical assistance to administrators and implementers of digital archiving services. The paper builds on the foundations laid down in "Preserving Digital Information: Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information" (1996), a watershed paper <http://www.rlg.org/ArchTF/index.html> commissioned by RLG and the Commission on Preservation and Access, as well as on the more recent "Open Archival Information System (OAIS) reference model" advanced by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (148-page, July 2001 PDF document: http://www.ccsds.org/rpa117/CCSDS-650.0-R-2.pdf). Readers of the "Attributes" report need not be expert in technical details; it calls for a general awareness of digital preservation and surrounding issues. In five sections, the paper: * proposes a definition of a trusted digital repository; * identifies the primary attributes of such a repository; * articulates a framework for developing a certification program; * identifies the responsibilities of an OAIS-compliant digital repository; and * makes several recommendations for follow-on work. The expert working group charged by RLG and OCLC to develop "Attributes of a Trusted Digital Repository" comprised Neil Beagrie, Joint Information Systems Committee, UK; Meg Bellinger, Preservation Resources, OCLC; Robin Dale, RLG; Marianne Doerr, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek; Margaret Hedstrom, University of Michigan; Anne Kenney, Cornell University; Catherine Lupovici, Biblioth�que national de France; Kelly Russell, Cedars Project (CURL Exemplarsin Digital Archives), UK; and Colin Webb, National Library of Australia. The first report resulting from the RLG-OCLC collaborative effort to create infrastructures for digital archiving was "Preservation Metadata for Digital Objects: A Review of the State of the Art." That 50-page white paper was issued in March 2001 and is available at: http://www.oclc.org/digitalpreservation. * * * * * * * * * * Headquartered in Mountain View, California, RLG (http://www.rlg.org) is a not-for-profit membership corporation of over 160 universities, national libraries, archives, historical societies, and other institutions with remarkable collections for research and learning. In addition to a range of collaborative activities that address members' shared goals for these collections, RLG develops and operates databases and software to serve the information needs of member and non- member institutions and individuals around the world. Headquartered in Dublin, Ohio, OCLC Online Computer Library Center (http://www.oclc.org) is a nonprofit organization that provides computer-based cataloging, reference, resource sharing, and preservation services to 40,000 libraries in 76 countries and territories. OCLC was founded in 1967 to improve access to the world's information and reduce information costs, and conducts ongoing research to develop technologies to support that mission. Preservation Resources is a division of OCLC. [RLG news releases home page: http://www.rlg.org/pr/pressrel.html]
- Prev by Date: RE: Monopolies and competition
- Next by Date: Re: Elsevier no longer signing consortial agreements for ScienceDirect
- Prev by thread: Public Library of Science, Latest
- Next by thread: RE: Monopolies and competition
- Index(es):