[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Librarian "terrorists" and the AAP
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Librarian "terrorists" and the AAP
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 09:38:55 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I notice that in Judy Platt's letter she (quite properly) deprecates the position > that no one--neither a publisher nor an author, nor anyone else should > be able to encrypt copyrighted material to protect it from unauthorized > use and reproduction, and later refers to > the legitimate copyright interests of authors and publishers. >From this, it appears that she is of the opinion that electronic text is protected under the Copyright law, and not under more restrictive contractual provisions. Many librarians, including myself, feel that this should be the case, but I have not recently heard it expressed by a publisher. I am glad that she, and presumably those she represents, now considers the provisions of ordinary copyright sufficient protection, and that its Fair Use provisions apply to electronic versions as well. No librarian asks for more. Perhaps publishers will now revise their contracts to acknowledge this, if indeed they even continue to feel the need for special contracts for electronic versions of printed material, since the Copyright Act has served their interest well in print will do so equally well in electronic formats > Part 1.1Type: Plain Text (text/plain) -- David Goodman Biology Librarian and Digital Resources Researcher Princeton University Library Princeton, NJ 08544-0001 phone: 609-258-3235 fax: 609-258-2627 e-mail: dgoodman@princeton.edu
- Prev by Date: The Number for Different E-Journal Subjects
- Next by Date: Bowker Limitation of Liability
- Prev by thread: Librarian "terrorists" and the AAP
- Next by thread: RE: The embargo debate: tenor and motivations
- Index(es):