[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: History of licensing
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: History of licensing
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:10:28 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <200107122137.RAA27531@gr.its.yale.edu>
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Nick: I looked at the "bibliography" section of the LIBLICENSE web site (http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/index.shtml) and did a "find" command. There was only one very brief article with "history" in our abstract. Here it is, in case of use: Flanagan, Michael. "Database licensing: a future view." Computers in libraries, 13:1 (Jan. 1993): 21-22. After a brief review of the history of database licensing up to the writing of the article (1992), the author speculates on the mounting of full-text databases on PAC systems in ACSII text and on the impact of the Z39.50 standard. My recollection is that we signed our first contracts with Dialog; that must have been sometime in the late 70s? Sometime a little later there was BRS, then STN. Databases on CDs arrived in the 80s.. I associate all those early products with high prices, scarcity, novelty, and cutting-edge librarians & users. Regards, Ann Okerson Yale University ann.okerson@yale.edu _______________________________________________________ On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Nick Smith wrote: > Hi (This is my first post to this list): > > I'm interested to find out if anyone has any information on the history of > licensing electronic resources. (I've had a look through the archives but > can't find anything on this.) > > I understand that packaged computer programs were the first to be > accompanied by licences. Although paper books could just as easily be > shrinkwrapped as software, they were not for the following reasons: (1) > software publishers have a (reasonably justified) fear of digital piracy > that does not exist with paper materials; (2) computer programs *require* > a license of some kind (they must be reproduced on the users hard drive > whereas the ordinary use of a book does not involve copyright); (3) > consumers would have reacted in horror to shrink-wrap licensed books > whereas the new market for computer software was not 'burdened' by these > expectations. > > When did licence agreements start to migrate from operating systems and > applications to content resources? Who led the way here and why? (I guess > the desire to maintain a greater level of control is a prominent reason). > > Thanks > > Nick > > ========================================================= > Nick Smith > Executive Officer :: Australian Digital Alliance > Copyright Advisor :: Australian Libraries Copyright Committee > PO Box E202 \\ Kingston ACT 2604 > Ph: 02 6262 1273 \\ Fax: 02 6273 2545 > Email: nsmith@nla.gov.au \\ Web: www.digital.org.au > ========================================================= >
- References:
- History of licensing
- From: Nick Smith <NSMITH@nla.gov.au>
- History of licensing
- Prev by Date: Re: History of licensing
- Next by Date: Re: History of licensing
- Prev by thread: History of licensing
- Next by thread: Re: History of licensing
- Index(es):