[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Authors Guild Suit Against NY Times
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Authors Guild Suit Against NY Times
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 20:05:16 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 5, 2001 AUTHORS GUILD AND FREELANCERS BRING COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT SUIT AGAINST NEW YORK TIMES Class Action Seeks Global Resolution to Dispute Over Contributions to Times' Electronic Database NEW YORK -- The Authors Guild and freelance writers Derrick Bell and Lynn Brenner filed a copyright infringement suit against the New York Times late Tuesday afternoon in federal court in Manhattan. The plaintiffs seek class-action status to represent all freelance writers who have contributed works that originally appeared in a New York Times print publication and were subsequently reproduced in the Times' electronic database or other electronic databases without the writers' authorization. The freelance writers had licensed the Times to use their works in print editions, but not in its electronic databases, or those that it licenses to third parties. Last week, in New York Times v. Tasini, the Supreme Court ruled that the Times had infringed the copyrights of a group of freelancers by making such electronic uses of their articles. "The Authors Guild has taken this action to protect the economic interests of our members and all freelance writers," said Guild president Letty Cottin Pogrebin. "Our action has been prompted by the Times' aggressive campaign of the past 10 days." Since the Supreme Court's decision, the Times has been telling the public and its freelance contributors through public statements and a Web site that it is now compelled to remove articles from its electronic archives unless writers release the Times from liability. "This does not strike us as an appropriate posture for the so-called paper of record," added Pogrebin. "The Supreme Court didn't say the Times had to remove the articles, it said the Times had to pay for them," explained plaintiff Derrick Bell, a visiting law professor at New York University and a member of the Guild's governing board. "The Court stressed that these rights issues could be resolved through licensing systems, such as that operated by the Authors Registry. The Times shakes its head about the tragic loss to the public of parts of its archive, yet won't even begin to negotiate payment for the works it wants to use in its databases." "The Times continues to show a deliberate disregard for the possibility of acquiring proper licenses to these works," said Guild executive director Paul Aiken. "The Times has gone to great lengths to avoid sharing some of its database revenue with its contributors, compelling many freelancers to retroactively surrender their electronic rights to their prior work without additional payment if they want to contribute to the newspaper now or in the future." "The legal principle has been established -- the Times' unauthorized electronic use of freelance articles is copyright infringement," said Michael Boni of Kohn, Swift & Graf, attorneys for the plaintiffs. "With this action we seek to resolve this dispute on a global basis, both for past infringement and for future uses of the freelance works." The Guild and freelance writers had sued nine database companies last August over the databases' use of freelance articles. Mr. Boni also represents the plaintiffs in that action, for which plaintiffs also seek class-action status. The Authors Registry is a not-for-profit organization that functions as a clearinghouse for rights payments. It has 30,000 writers in its database and has paid writers more than $1.5 million in photocopy and electronic rights royalties to date. These payments have been made for re-use -- including electronic database use -- of freelance articles and books. Writers need not be Guild members to enroll; 36 writers' organizations and 109 literary agencies have signed up to include their members and clients. "The Authors Registry is an ideal vehicle for resolving these issues," said Pogrebin. The Authors Guild, founded in 1912, is the largest organization of published book authors and freelance journalists in America. --end---
- Prev by Date: PubScience Threatened
- Next by Date: Re: CNSLP
- Prev by thread: CNSLP
- Next by thread: Re: PubScience Threatened
- Index(es):