[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini
- From: "Peter V. Picerno" <ppicerno@utmem.edu>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:07:12 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This morning on NPR the NY Times was already quoted as saying that they would begin to pull "hundreds of thousands of articles" so even if they don't raise prices, online versions won't be as complete as print. The fallout from this will be interesting ... Peter Picerno -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu]On Behalf Of John Webb Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:40 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini Any bets that they use it as an excuse to raise prices?
- Prev by Date: PURCHASE ONLINE AT CAMBRIDGE JOURNALS ONLINE
- Next by Date: Re: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini
- Prev by thread: Re: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini
- Next by thread: Re: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini
- Index(es):