[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:15:08 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Any bets that they use it as an excuse to raise prices? Well, if their costs end up rising significantly as a result of this ruling, I'm not sure "excuse" would be the right word. I think the legal reasoning behind it is sound, but it does force us, yet again, to face up to the fact that there is no such thing as free information. ------------- Rick Anderson Electronic Resources/Serials Coordinator The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "Let us beware most of all and 1664 No. Virginia St. criticize most effectively those Reno, NV 89557 with whom we yearn to agree." PH (775) 784-6500 x273 -- Debra Nails FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Ruling on Tasini Case
- Next by Date: RE: Ruling on Tasini Case
- Prev by thread: Re: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini
- Next by thread: Re: Supreme Court Ruling--Copyright--New York Times v. Tasini
- Index(es):