[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
License Agreements for Nature Monthlies and Reviews available
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: License Agreements for Nature Monthlies and Reviews available
- From: kaemper@ub.uni-stuttgart.de
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:27:17 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Yesterday, the missing license agreements - Academic and Government - for the Nature Sister Journals (= Nature Monthlies) and Nature Reviews Journals have been posted on the Nature website, cf. http://www.nature.com/help/sitelicences/licence_agreements/index.html Note that there now is one common license agreement for the Monthlies and Reviews (and for Corporate Licensees, even a common license agreement for all Nature titles). Don't look for any changes in license clauses that already met criticism in the case of the revised Nature Site License. There are none. Most of the language in the license agreement is identical to the version of September 2000. The old and new versions differ only in the Schedule, i.e. in the Licensed Material (for the Monthlies, former references to a restriction of licensed content to the 'Research article section' have been removed) and in the replacement of the term 'Site' (meaning more a physical location) by the somewhat ambiguous notion 'Department'. (It seems that the wording has been chosen to guarantee continuity and close correspondence between previous and present license agreements for the Monthlies and Reviews.) Furthermore, "Staff and Students" are introduced as relevant parameters (cf. also the added paragraphs 5.3 and 5.4), here defined as 'the full time students enrolled or accredited to the Department and the full time teaching and research staff employed within or otherwise accredited to the Department'. --Perhaps this is a misunderstanding, but it could indicate that it is possible to ignore the overall (Life and Physical) Sciences FTE and just restrict access to a specific department if that is wanted. (Once again, the license summaries provided by the NPG here are different from the actual license agreements.) If you really want a campus-wide license you probably will have to include several departments, resp. all "Sciences departments". >From what I hear from other libraries, prices for Monthlies and Reviews have come down considerably. Compared to the first new pricing proposal from Nature made public on their server for a short time at the end of April, prices for single title purchases to Monthlies & Reviews halfed, and prices for the complete suite of 7+3 titles decreased by 30%. For the smallest sites (< 1000 FTE), I have been told that prices are subject to negotiation and decided on a case-by-case basis. Best Regards, Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, Stuttgart University Library
- Prev by Date: Cambridge Journals Online
- Next by Date: Re: License Agreements for Nature Monthlies and Reviews available
- Prev by thread: Re: Strange response to my copyright message
- Next by thread: Re: License Agreements for Nature Monthlies and Reviews available
- Index(es):