[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Moderating and Administrative Thoughts
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Moderating and Administrative Thoughts
- From: Fred Friend <ucylfjf@ucl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:14:08 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I agree with Peter's comment about the value of even self-promoting postings in enabling challenging dialogue to take place. Such postings should be factual, and that would be how I would distinguish them from advertising hype. The challenges in the dialogue that can ensue will probably be both to vendors and to librarians - my observation on liblicense discussions is that the librarians do not always have justice on their side - but as an optimist I always hope that the service to library users will benefit from frank and open discussion. Fred Friend At 17:29 01/06/01 EDT, you wrote: > > Still other readers have expressed a concern to me that > sometimes the postings on the list are too self-promoting of a > given correspondent's commercial business. This is a harder > area for your moderator, though again liblicense-l strives to > include as much as possible, even press releases where they > appear to serve a useful and informative role. > >Many thanks to Ann Okerson for the entirety of this very thoughtful and, >indeed, decorous, posting. As to the paragraph cited above, we are all >rational professionals and can thus distinguish between marketing hype (in >whatever veild forms it appears) and 'real' arguments of merit. At the >same time, postings which are self-promoting would invite direct >challenges from other members of this list which is also a great advantage >since we, the consumers -- or potential consumers -- can generate frank >and open discussions about the products we are meant to consume. These >discussions can open paths of exploration of issues which might not >otherwise exist and which might actually have some effect on the products >offered to us. In my personal opinion, I feel that we, the members of this >list, should feel free to challenge (in a positive and constructive way) >those products with the intent of engaging their designers and creators in >dialogue with the library community. If such a forum can exist -- and it >may very well develop some tensions from time to time -- where (to quote >an old adage) is the bad part?? > >Peter Picerno
- Prev by Date: Library Consortia IFLA Preconference
- Next by Date: RE: Moderating and Administrative Thoughts
- Prev by thread: Re: Moderating and Administrative Thoughts
- Next by thread: RE: Moderating and Administrative Thoughts
- Index(es):