[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- From: kaemper@ub.uni-stuttgart.de
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 13:50:55 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Rick wrote (with respect to Science Online) > The fact that this level of service doesn't include extras > (like pre-publication article access) is fine with us, as long as it > includes the basics (like access to articles as soon as they're > published). Sorry, but that's not true. It's not pre-publication access with Science. ScienceExpress articles are considered published (and citable) as soon as they are out in the online version. The rest is just cosmetics. You could even say that the practice of Science is worse because it concerns refereed primary research articles that immediately get cited while the embargo of Nature affected "only" other material. And I can assure you that libraries get routinely requests from users for that material or are pressed to buy an article in advance. By the way, I bet that Nature will soon follow the example of Science. It is already forseeable if you look carefully at the language of their new site license for Nature. But it doesn't really matter if publishers try to restrict this to subscribers. Authors will care for themselves. It will be enough if authors put their material on e-print servers (set up by university libraries) as soon as they get it published (for Journals like Science or Nature, where there is some "risk" involved) or even before that (for other journals) - Harnads subversive proposal. The OAi (Open Archives Initiative) standard is there, and it will be implemented on a broad scale very soon (this summer there will be several implementation workshops in Germany, for example). Publishers will not like it but scientists will demand it. Science and Nature have so many added value features to offer that I don't fear for their future. It does not have to be the bottle neck of advance or delayed access which is not at all in the interest of the authors. I certainly agree with you that libraries can provide only as much as they can within the constraints of their budget. But we will make our faculty aware that it is their responsibility to make sure that the articles they write get an exposure as widely as possible and we will do what is needed to assist them in that. Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, Stuttgart University Library
- Prev by Date: Re: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Next by Date: EBSCO and ProQuest database content
- Prev by thread: Re: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Next by thread: RE: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Index(es):