[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 04:34:22 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Leaving aside whether Science Online is > or is not a good deal, by that argument, doubling or quadrupling (or more) > our expenditures for every resource that moves from print to sitewide > online access will always look like a bargain because the cost per > institutional user (real or potential) will always be less than the cost > of an individual print subscription. That's simply not a sustainable > equation. I agree. I would never argue that low per-FTE cost always equals good value. My argument is that in the particular case of Science (given the level of use we expect and the quality of its content) my institution is getting a bargain. Another publication might be a rotten deal at the same price. Another publication might be a rotten deal at no charge, for that matter. ------------- Rick Anderson Electronic Resources/Serials Coordinator The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno 1664 No. Virginia St. Reno, NV 89557 PH (775) 784-6500 x273 FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Next by Date: RE: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Prev by thread: Re: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Next by thread: RE: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Index(es):