[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 09:34:28 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> You are basing that calculation on the assumption that all of those users > represented by the library will actually use the resource. No, I'm basing it on the assumption that all of those users have the _opportunity_ to use it. Granted, not all of them will take advantage. But at UNR, we break even at 46 users -- every user beyond that number is getting access for less than $77 of the library's money, and many of those users will be faculty members (who would have had to pay $127 for an individual subscription). There's simply no way to reasonably construe institutional access to Science Online as anything less than a bargain for most institutions. (Nor, I maintain, is there any reasonable way to construe the existence of a higher-priced premium service as "discrimination.") ------------- Rick Anderson Electronic Resources/Serials Coordinator The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno 1664 No. Virginia St. Reno, NV 89557 PH (775) 784-6500 x273 FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Next by Date: Re: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Prev by thread: RE: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Next by thread: Re: National Online: Nature and Others... (like SCIENCE)
- Index(es):