[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fair use and publisher and librarian attitudes (was: Electronic journals and CCC)
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Fair use and publisher and librarian attitudes (was: Electronic journals and CCC)
- From: Edward Barrow <edward@copyweb.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 18:38:37 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This debate has a long history with little agreement on either side, and I can't help feeling that it's time to move on. The argument that "fair use rights" exist and should be protected seems to me to be missing the point. It is important that licences should cover the expected uses of the material; it is counterproductive for rightsholders to insist on terms which prohibit things which users naturally want to do with their stuff (otherwise they will be honoured more in the breach, or the licensee will take on an unreasonable policing burden). If some of those things might be considered "fair use", there is still no reason to exclude them from the licence; the clarity and reassurance that both sides will gain from having them written in are well worth while. Interlibrary document supply (I refuse to use the word "loan" for something which is never intended to be returned) does present a difficulty, however, when licences are drawn with a clear perimeter in mind. It is perhaps less of a threat than it was in the days of "subscription rationalisation" by consortia, aiming to use ILDS to fill the resulting holes in coverage, but the clear threat remains that non-subscribing institutions could use it to avoid subscribing. Another concern is that it could undermine commercially-licensed document delivery, which is a growing market. Neverthless, the fact that so many institutions require the facility suggests that publishers would do well to cater for the demand. There are ways of doing so within the scope of licences, without having to call on the uncertainty of fair use, with the consent of both rightsholders and the user community. Again the experience of the UK may prove instructive; the EASY project, financed by JISC with the support of the Publishers Association, aims to provide individual articles to users direct from the servers of participating publishers, at a cost no greater than a library privilege copy obtained from the British Library. [Interlibrary loan and document supply in the UK is centralised through the British Library, which supplies "library privilege" copies to libraries under a specific provision of UK copyright law, without paying any fee to the copyright holder] Edward Barrow New media copyright consultant edward@copyweb.co.uk Important: see http://www.copyweb.co.uk/email.htm for the legal status of this email
- Prev by Date: RE: disappearing years of sold journals
- Next by Date: RE: Nature Contract Provisions
- Prev by thread: Re: New Release: Demand for IDEAL Highest Ever
- Next by thread: Fair use (RE: electronic journals CCC)
- Index(es):