[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: electronic journals CCC
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: electronic journals CCC
- From: <S.MATTERN@KARGER.CH>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:16:54 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
>Some vendors don't seem to be able to distinguish >between cost recovery by a library and a commercial enterprise of an >information broker or information company that actually makes a profit on >this activity. I guess I must be one of them. Could you please clarify what *cost recovery* means in this case? Once you recover the cost of the subscription, do you stop charging an ILL fee or does the cost recovery have to do with the administrative costs associated with ILL? Thanks for your input. ________________________________ Sharon Mattern Buettiker,=20 Internet Services Coordinator S. Karger AG =20 BioMedical Publishers since 1890 Allschwilerstrasse 10 CH-4009 Basel Switzerland E-mail: s.mattern@karger.ch Web Site: http://www.karger.com Direct Telephone: +41-61-306-1350 Fax: +41-61-306-1234 >>> twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu 26.04.2001 19:29:21 >>> Mike, lucky for us that Sue Medina has been steadfast in her insistance that copyright law, including "Fair Use" and Contu guidelines be honored in the NAAl contracts she's negotiated with various vendors. Still, it's very important that library administrators, when negotiating individually, insist on this same thing. Publishers as a group would love to see "Fair Use" and Contu guidelines go away and I've seen more than one contract that tries to do that. However, in most cases libraries can negotiate back to fairness. If we refuse to sign when ILL/Doc Del is prohibited the vendors, at least the smart ones, generally come around. Recently we've been back and forth with one major vendor who has actually cut out a portion of Fair Use in the contract. They refuse to allow us to provide ILLs or articles to organizations which pay any fee. There is nothing in the copyright law nor the Contu guidelines that exclude cost recovery. The ironic part to this issue for that company is that their refusal to honor fair use in this case will have little to no impact on us. Just about all of the titles we use regularly are already on our shelves in print format so we'll still be able to provide ILLs to all of our users - including those that get charged a cost recovery fee. Print journals are covered under fair use and Contu. Online versions do not always as we are required to sign separate contracts and the vendors do their best to cut out certain of our rights in some cases. However, we are negotiating a separate deal for this and hope to get this issue resolved soon. Some vendors don't seem to be able to distinguish between cost recovery by a library and a commercial enterprise of an information broker or information company that actually makes a profit on this activity. Negotiating these licenses is a tricky business and we have, on more than one occasion, been told one thing verbally during negotiations and found the opposite to be true when the written contract/license is finally presented by the vendor. There are land mines all over the place so we all have to keep our eyes open when working out these online licenses. Tom -- Thomas L. Williams, AHIP Director, Biomedical Libraries and Media Production Services University of South Alabama College of Medicine Mobile, Al 36688-0002 tel. (334)460-6885 fax. (334)460-7638 twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu=20 On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 simmon11@msu.edu wrote: > Sue Medina, > > I commend you on your staunch support of US Copyright Law and the CONTU > guidelines. I'm curious, however, as to how many vendors/publishers of > electronic journals have said, "Tough" and proceeded to deny access? > > How many readers of this list have negotiated interlibrary loan rights = in > situations where it clearly states that ILL is not permitted from the > electronic format? Aside from dealing with aggregators I do not think > that I would have the time to negotiate each and every contract. By not > doing so I guess I can be accused of allowing the status quo established > by the publishers to be perpetuated. The larger library with staff > dedicated to more narrow duties may be able to negotiate special = contracts > but that is not the case in a small hospital library. > > Mike Simmons > Sparrow Health System Medical Library. > _____________________________ > > smedina@ache.state.al.us said: > > > I tell all vendors that NAAL will not waive rights under the U. S. > > Copyright Law and the CONTU guidelines. > > > > Sue O. Medina > > Director > > Network of Alabama Academic Libraries > > P. O. Box 302000 > > Montgomery, AL 36130-2000 > > 334-242-2211 > > smedina@ache.state.al.us=20
- Prev by Date: Re: disappearing years of sold journals
- Next by Date: The Future of Licensing: moving into the digital age
- Prev by thread: The Future of Licensing: moving into the digital age
- Next by thread: Re: electronic journals CCC
- Index(es):