[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Random House v RosettaBooks
- To: <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Random House v RosettaBooks
- From: "Michael Somers" <Libsome@isugw.indstate.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:18:30 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hello-- If you cannot pore over the entire contents of this site, I highly recommend reading the Amicus Brief. It is rather enlightening. Mike Somers >>> cahamake@email.uncc.edu 04/18/01 04:41PM >>> Mike Somers recently forwarded to me a link on a lawsuit I had not heard about, but which has explosive ramifications for the nascent e-book industry. Random House v RosettaBooks for the whole article see: http://www.rosettabooks.com/pages/legal.html RosettaBooks has contractually acquired and paid for the electronic-publishing rights to nearly 100 titles, including several works by William Styron, Kurt Vonnegut and Robert Parker. On February 27, 2001, Random House, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bertlesmann, filed suit against RosettaBooks LLC and Arthur Klebanoff, individually, in federal court in the Southern District of New York. The suit alleges that Random House owns exclusive electronic rights to the titles by William Styron, Kurt Vonnegut and Robert Parker and that Rosetta is infringing Random House's rights by publishing these titles electronically. Fundamentally, Random House argues that the limited grants it received 20-to-40 years ago to "print, publish and sell in book form" should now be interpreted to include e-books. Random House has sought injunctive relief including an order which would prevent Rosetta from approaching the authors of the nearly 21,000 Random House backlist titles. Random House claims to own the electronic rights to its entire backlist whether there is a specific electronic rights grant in the contract or not.
- Prev by Date: No Subject
- Next by Date: alumni access to e-resources
- Prev by thread: Random House v RosettaBooks
- Next by thread: Re: Random House v RosettaBooks
- Index(es):