[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blackwell Policy
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, Selden Durgom Lamoureux <lamours@email.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Blackwell Policy
- From: Carole Richter <Carole.J.Richter.8@nd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 20:00:52 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Selden, For most publishers the idea is not that you are licensing content for the year (which then should logically be prorated) but that you are 'buying' the electronic version for the year...you *own* the full year of access regardless of what you decide to do in the future. The publisher is 'committed' (in a sort of vaguely convincing way---in 'some' format, and if the titles aren't sold) to maintaining access to what you now own. Now we realize that one or two years permanent electronic access would be pretty worthless if we went back to print, being able to access only a couple isolated years electronically. But their point is that you have the entire year available for access from the time of subscription. This has been pretty standard--it surprised me too at first, but they do have a reasonable point from their perspective. If you only wanted the subscription to begin in say Sept, with access to commence from that point in time that might be reasonable too, but it would no doubt add a lot of custom configuration requirements at the publishing end. Index-to-content aggregators such as EBSCO or Gale, logically prorate from the point of subscription because you subscribe to what there 'is' at any point in time. That's true for any indexing service. With the actual electronic version of the full journal, you If you want the subscription, it seems somewhat reasonable to bite the bullet and provide a full year of access. Obviously it would be nice to have the option, though. Carole Richter Electronic Resources Coordinator University of Notre Dame Libraries (219)631-8405 richter.8@nd.edu _______________________________ At 08:28 PM 4/1/2001 EDT, Monica Metz-Wiseman (ADM) wrote: > >On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Selden Durgom Lamoureux wrote: > >> Last fall we initiated a conversation with Blackwell Science (which later >> included Blackwell Publishing) for their electronic journal package. >> Their pricing and content are attractive. But they just sent us the >> license this month, and with it the news that their policy requires a >> January - December subscription year and prohibits them from prorating. >> >> I have a strong initial reaction to this, but insufficient experience to >> judge wisely. Do other publishers have and exercise such policies for >> their electronic packages, or is Blackwell outside the norm? >> >> -Selden
- Prev by Date: Re: Blackwell Policy
- Next by Date: Music Subscription Partnership Made, April 2-NY Times
- Prev by thread: Re: Blackwell Policy
- Index(es):