[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blackwell Policy
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Blackwell Policy
- From: Ulf Paepcke <paepcke@ukbf.fu-berlin.de>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 19:47:45 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The Medical Library is part of the Free University of Berlin which itself is a member of the socalled Friedrich-Althoff-Konsortium. In order to circumvent the difficulties mentioned in the messages below the Althoff-Konsortium negotiated a "paid trial period" with Blackwell Science, starting in summer last year until the end of 2000. The same was done with Kluwer and it both times worked very well. Regards from Berlin Dr. med. Ulf Paepcke Univ.-Klinikum Benjamin Franklin Medizinische Bibliothek Tel. 030-8445 3511 Hindenburgdamm 30 Fax 030-8445 4454 12200 Berlin ___________________________________________ At 20:19 01.04.01 EDT, you wrote: >Same case with Wiley, Elsevier, Springer. > >Doina G. Farkas >Contracts and Development Officer >UNT Libraries >P.O. Box 305190 >Denton, TX 75203 >Voice Mail: (940) 565-2608 >Fax: (940) 369-8760 >E-Mail: DFarkas@library.unt.edu > >>>> lamours@email.unc.edu 03/30/01 11:35AM >>> > >Last fall we initiated a conversation with Blackwell Science (which later >included Blackwell Publishing) for their electronic journal package. >Their pricing and content are attractive. But they just sent us the >license this month, and with it the news that their policy requires a >January - December subscription year and prohibits them from prorating. > >I have a strong initial reaction to this, but insufficient experience to >judge wisely. Do other publishers have and exercise such policies for >their electronic packages, or is Blackwell outside the norm? > >-Selden
- Prev by Date: (Fwd) RE: Ebsco Full-Text Databases Post
- Next by Date: Re: Ebsco Full-Text Databases Post
- Prev by thread: Re: Blackwell Policy
- Next by thread: Re: Blackwell Policy
- Index(es):