[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Interesting item in FirstMonday
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Interesting item in FirstMonday
- From: "Rickerson, George" <RickersonG@umsystem.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:23:42 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Very interesting; thanks, Bernie, for the post. I agree with Cox that Henderson goes too far, but there is some truth to what Henderson writes. In my first professional position (in a small college in Washington state, 1973) I encountered a young budget director who asked me one day if the library's collection wouldn't soon be complete. He was dismayed to learn that it would not and that the college would need to plan on budgeting funds for library acquisitions more or less forever. I attributed his unrealistic expectations to youth and naivete. Now I work for the University of Missouri System. We are in the final stages of the implementation of a resource sharing system that covers nearly all of the academic institutions in Missouri. In 1998, while describing the project to a meeting of provosts from across the state, I was challenged to explain why this project would not make it possible to drastically cut library acquisitions budgets at member institutions, "and don't give me that standard response that, for resource sharing to work, the libraries need resources to share." These weren't young, naive budget directors. They were chief academic officers from baccalaureate and graduate institutions throughout the state. I know that academic librarians are not complicit in furthering this ignorant idea, but I have to say that we have been largely unsuccessful in educating the academic administrators who oversee our funding about the role of libraries in the mission of our institutions. I think it is unfortunate that a person can earn a Ph.D without at least accidentally learning what it is that academic libraries do. What does the phrase "recorded knowledge of man" mean? Where do administrators think this recorded knowledge is? Sorry for the rant. George. ************************************************ George Rickerson Assistant Vice President for Library Systems UM System Executive Director MOBIUS 3215B Lemone Industrial Boulevard Columbia, MO 65201 573-882-7233 FAX 573-884-3395 Toll-free in Missouri: 1-877-3MOBIUS rickersong@umsystem.edu *************************************** > -----Original Message----- > From: Sloan, Bernie [mailto:bernies@uillinois.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 6:45 PM > To: 'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu' > Subject: Interesting item in FirstMonday > > > > Sort of along the lines of the Pat Schroeder flap last month on > liblicense-l, here's another item that might provoke some discussion: > > Henderson, Albert. "The 'Big Lie' and The Great Newspaper Caper." > FirstMonday, 6(3), March 5, 2001: > > http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/current_issue/henderson/index.html > > It begins as a reaction to an earlier Richard Cox article criticizing > Nicholas Baker's views on newspaper preservation, but quickly > turns into > something different, criticizing the way academic library and higher > education administrators have handled budgeting for library > materials, and > how this has impacted publishers and the scholarly community. > > This same issue includes a reaction to the article from Richard Cox: > > http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/current_issue/cox/index.html > > Bernie Sloan > Senior Library Information Systems Consultant > University of Illinois Office for Planning and Budgeting > 338 Henry Administration Building > 506 S. Wright Street > Urbana, IL 61801 > Phone: (217) 333-4895 > Fax: (217) 265-0454 > E-mail: bernies@uillinois.edu >
- Prev by Date: Is there life after E-prints?
- Next by Date: FW: Nature Questions
- Prev by thread: Interesting item in FirstMonday
- Next by thread: [DUC] DISCUSSION: Interesting Intellectual Property Debate
- Index(es):