[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Comments about Nature
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Comments about Nature
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 10:06:00 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There are some key phrases in the reaction from Nature in the Mar 1 LJ Academic Newswire that I think noteworthy (For reference, their reaction is reprinted at the bottom.) "Unexpected reaction" Our response is hardly unexpected: Hundreds of librarians have been telling the Nature sales representatives this for months, and they have undoubtedly informed their management. "extensive market research ... among 48,000. The response from the subscribers was..." Note that she gives no figures for the percentage of subscribers who answered that way, or the other responses they may have received. The likely situation is that some personal subscribers will certainly cancel, but hardly all of them. I suspect that at the institutions where faculty have large grants, almost all of them will continue, and that in less well-funded places a larger number will. To price on the basis that they will all drop out immediately is certainly pessimistic. They do not seem to realize, how widely all the parts of their publication is read. "no personal subscriber who used the library copy for the news section" If this is true, then they clearly have no reason to eliminate it from the library online version either "substantial number" They have the figures, and if they are not more precise than that there is presumably a reason. I personally expect some small medically-oriented or heavily scitech-oriented schools to sign, but I do not think more than about 10% of the larger research universities will. "constantly discussing" If this wording appeared in the minutes of a committee here, I would interpret this to mean that there is no agreement whatsoever. "no immediate plans" That is not the same as "no plans." Their plans will be determined by their sales. If they make very few institutional sales in the next month they may change plans very quickly. The sales will be determined by whether we all hold firm. We must hold firm because of the unfairness to the students. $99 for a personal subscription is a lot for a graduate student. And the undergraduates? The way Nature sees the academic world, a few months doesn't matter to them. "tailored to meet library needs" Perhaps they think that "library needs" still just means "print." Other publications are prepared to follow Nature's example, and some are making tentative steps of various sorts in that direction. It is very desirable that a publication have personal subscribers, but Nature's policy seems well tailored to destroy the public function of the library, and restrict the prompt availability of scientific information to those who can individually afford it. ---------------------------- LJ Academic Newswire (Mar.1, 2001) LIBRARY COMMUNITY'S REACTION TO SITE LICENSE TAKES NATURE BY SURPRISE ... NATURE Marketing Director Della Sar told the LJ ACADEMIC NEWSWIRE that the "unexpected reaction" of the library community seemed to defy market research done by the publisher. "During 1999 and 2000 we carried out extensive market research amongst our 48,000-plus personal subscribers," says Sar. "The response from the subscribers was, that [since] all of them have online access to all content at no additional charge, and certainly well ahead of receipt of their paper copies in most cases, they primarily use their library copies for archival research. In fact there was almost no personal subscriber who said they used the library copy for the news section." Asked if this unexpected reaction might cause the publisher to amend its current embargo policy, Sar said no. "We are naturally constantly discussing our license terms," she noted, "but...have no immediate plans [to amend the policy]. Sar noted that the current model was tailored to meet library needs by offering access, albeit restricted by the embargoes, 24 hours seven days a week, campus-wide. -- David Goodman Biology Librarian and Co-chair, Electronic Journals Task force Princeton University Library Princeton, NJ 08544-0001 phone: 609-258-3235 fax: 609-258-2627 e-mail: dgoodman@princeton.edu
- Prev by Date: DeCSS
- Next by Date: Re: Nature notice
- Prev by thread: online discussion on a new model for publishing scholarly journals
- Next by thread: Re: Comments about Nature
- Index(es):