[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Nature
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Nature
- From: "MARGARET LANDESMAN" <mlandesm@library.utah.edu>
- Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 21:48:20 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I wanted to comment re. Nature. The future often resembles the past, and that may hold true here. Nature - a weekly with a cost half the average commercial science journals - gives us a per-page cost among our lowest. Given its history, maybe we should assume they will continue to do so; they just haven't figured out how yet. Though it would be very nice if it were easier to talk to them about it. But I don't think their fears unfounded. Labs here are very interested in campus access. These researchers have full access with individual subscriptions. It's my distinct impression they hope to cancel - maybe not this year, but eventually. Nature is a one-off - perhaps more akin to something like the Chronicle of Higher Ed in its economics and the role it plays in its various constituencies - than to other science journals. While getting the initial pricing scheme wrong in a way that loses the company money may not threaten Nature itself, I expect it could be career threatening for those who got it wrong. Librarians have such job security, I think we tend to underestimate what that must feel like. I hope libraries stick to the professional tone Harvard's letter has set and view Nature not as a problem, but as an ally which is having a problem. Margaret Landesman Head, Collection Development Marriott Library University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0860 phone: (801) 581-7741 fax: (801) 585-3464 e-mail: mlandesm@library.utah.edu
- Prev by Date: Washington Post article on Pat Schroder v. American libraries
- Next by Date: Re: Confidentiality of license agreements (RE: ILL & Licensing questions)
- Prev by thread: Re: Nature
- Index(es):