[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Including eReserve provisions in licensing contracts
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Including eReserve provisions in licensing contracts
- From: "Christine Maher" <c.maher@bl1.lib.latrobe.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:56:40 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There are now commercial e-reserve packages which some academic libraries are using to manage their e-reserves. My library is examining the possibilities of these at the moment. Apparently, some of these packages do not provide for links to URLs in externally-hosted services but are structured only to display e- documents from within the e-reserve programme. Where this situation prevails then articles from e-journals or aggregator services would have to be reproduced within the e- reserve domain and this immediately runs up against those licence provisions which forbid unauthorised reproduction. In such a case it seems to me that we still need the provision in licences allowing for e-reserves, or alternatively we should exercise a great deal of caution about which e-reserve packages we buy. Christine Maher ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Kathleen A. Zar" <kzar@midway.uchicago.edu> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Including eReserve provisions in licensing contracts Date sent: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:14:39 EST Send reply to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu I very much agree with Rick's statement. The clauses in the license describing authorized users should cover registered students in an official class. Moving on to define normal reserves activity within the license seems unnecessary and perhaps conflict producing if your institution has already taken the appropriate measures to prevent access by unauthorized users. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At 12:52 PM 11/21/00 -0500, you wrote: >It seems to me that linking to online articles to which the campus >community has access anyway shouldn't require any special license >language. As long as users are authenticated, it shouldn't matter whether >they gain access from a page titled "Electronic Journals" or from one >titled "Course Reserve." Really, you're not talking about "reserves" in >the traditional sense at all, just a thematically-organized page of links. >Coincidentally, just today I've had two separate conversations on this >topic with my colleagues here, and would be very interested in hearing >others' views. > >------------- >Rick Anderson >Electronic Resources/Serials Coordinator >The University Libraries >University of Nevada, Reno >1664 No. Virginia St. >Reno, NV 89557 >PH (775) 784-6500 x273 >FX (775) 784-1328 >rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Including eReserve provisions in licensing contracts
- Next by Date: RE: Including eReserve provisions in licensing contracts
- Prev by thread: Re: Including eReserve provisions in licensing contracts
- Next by thread: RE: Including eReserve provisions in licensing contracts
- Index(es):