[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: quality of Service
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: quality of Service
- From: "Anthony Watkinson" <anthony.watkinson@btinternet.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 19:06:30 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It looks as if CatchWord employees and their groupies have been quicker of the mark than HighWire or ingenta. Good for them but can we now accept that it is reasonable for libraries to expect publishers to have back-up and also that most publishers and their contractors do. I am aware that OUP work with a university based host and I am puzzled that the problem that has occurred can be as simple as described. Is it just a matter of theft of equipment in a situation where there was no back-up at all or has the back-up failed in some way which could not have been anticipated? What David Goodman says is reasonable though a little harsh. I wonder how many of those university presses who have gone online in the US have foolproof arrangements. I wonder if his patrons have always had exactly the service they could expect. Publishers should be willing and able to commit to continuous service but there will always be a "force majeure" clause in any contract. Will lurkers at OUP be able to tell us whether their supplier did not make proper back-up arrangements or was it a "force majeure" situation where no reasonable person (in legal terms) could have anticipated what went wrong. The answer to the question might cause a lot of for-profits and non-profits to look again at their own back-up arrangements or on the other hand they might breathe a sigh of relief. Anthony Watkinson 14, Park Street, Bladon, Woodstock, Oxon, England OX20 1RW phone +44 1993 811561 and fax 1993 810067 ----- Original Message ----- From: John Cox <John.E.Cox@btinternet.com> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 11:27 PM Subject: Re: quality of Service > David Goodman makes a good point. Many publishers - or their contractors > do maintain mirror sites; built-in redundancy is vital to the maintenance > of continuous and reliable service. > > Perhaps the best example I know of a company that has always taken this > issue seriously is CatchWord, which hosts journals from many publishers, > including Taylor & Francis, Mary Ann Liebert, Lawrence Erlbaum, MIT Press > etc. CatchWord has not one or two mirror sites, but a world-wide network > of over ten servers. This deals with the problem of slow response times > due to Internet congestion as well as the failure of any one - or two, > three etc - server. > > John Cox > Johnn Cox Associates
- Prev by Date: Quality of Service
- Next by Date: Re: Quality of Service
- Prev by thread: Quality of Service
- Next by thread: Re: Quality of Service
- Index(es):