[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quality of Service
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Quality of Service
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 17:58:08 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Paula Schmidt writes: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 15:27:54 -0500 From: SCHMIDT_PAULA_O@Lilly.com Subject: Re: quality of Service To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu There was a note on Oxford's home page when I was hunting for web addresses. The effect of this theft would certainly be embarrassing - like a printer whose presses are stolen. Paula ________________ dgoodman@Princeton.EDU (David Goodman (dgoodman on 08/31/2000 02:52:33 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: quality of Service The recent and continuing service failure at OUP due to theft of their service providers computer equipment makes evident the absolute necessity for any publisher offerring ejournals or databases to provide a mirror site or other immediately accessible backup. It is noteworthy that most of the free preprint sites offer this facility. For an enterprise charging money for the service not to offer it is inexcusably immature business practice. I think this requirement should be added to the standard contract terms. The use of electronic media to replace paper cannot be taken as a responsible proposition otherwise. David Goodman ___________________
- Prev by Date: NCCUSL limiting UCITA self-help
- Next by Date: Re: quality of Service
- Prev by thread: Re: quality of Service
- Next by thread: Re: quality of Service
- Index(es):