[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:Charleston Advisor Annoucement...
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re:Charleston Advisor Annoucement...
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 00:07:38 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Since I'm one of the people involved in the Charleston Advisor, I'd like to respond to Susan Mattern's question: "what is a "peer-reviewed reviewing source?" Each review in the Charleston advisor is reviewed by other reviewers. This is standard practice in peer reviewed publications. The reviews of the submitted reviews, can be quite strenuous, with detailed questions/responses/ followup to the authors. It is an interesting process, where all editorial board members are invited to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the reviews and authors given that feed-back. I think if you read some of them (some are free at the website http://www.charlestonco.com/ )you will understand what I am talking about. In addition, if there is strong disagreement with some aspect of the review, Then we invite members of the editorial board or others to write a rebuttal or a different analysis of the electronic resource being reviewed. Producers of the e-resources often are interviewed to respond to reviews and present their perspectives as well. In our second issue we had two reviews of Web of Science and in the next issue an interview with representatives from ISI. Even editorials can have responses. I recently did an essay on CrossRef, and in the new issue Ed Pentz presents his perspective on what CrossRef is about. It is peer reviewed and everyone involved in it is comitteed to in-depth analysis of e-resources. chuck Hamaker UnC Charlotte >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sharon Mattern [SMTP:S.MATTERN@KARGER.CH] >> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 2:30 PM >> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu >> Subject: Re: Charleston Advisor Announcement >> >> Katina Strauch writes: >> >> >The Charleston Advisor--the industry's only peer-reviewed reviewing >> source for electronic products--> >> >> What is a "peer-reviewed reviewing source?" >> >> Sharon Mattern Buettiker, Internet Services Department >> S. Karger AG >> Allschwilerstrasse 10 >> CH-4009 Basel >> Switzerland >> E-mail: s.mattern@karger.ch
- Prev by Date: Re: manifest assent & which version?
- Next by Date: Where's Waldo
- Prev by thread: Where's Waldo
- Next by thread: Re:Charleston Advisor Annoucement...
- Index(es):