[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eJournals - "subscription" period
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: eJournals - "subscription" period
- From: nbaum@notes.cc.sunysb.edu
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:19:40 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It may be possible to get reductions in other fees to compensate for a shortened subscription year, but in my experience they do seem to draw the line at prorating the subscription cost. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nathan Baum, Digital Resources Librarian, Melville Library, SUNY Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794-3331 Voice: 631.632.9959 Fax: 631.632.7116 E-mail: nathan.baum@sunysb.edu -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >From hammes@ais.up.ac.za Tue Jun 20 04:57:26 2000 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:56:29 +0200 From: Monica Hammes <hammes@ais.up.ac.za> Organization: Academic Information Service, University of Pretoria To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: eJournals - "subscription" period It seems that both publishers and journal vendors consider ejournals on par with pjournals as far as "subscription period" is concerned resulting in the following kind of scenario with which we are presently grappling: A client requests a subscription to an ejournal which will probably become available at the beginning of July resulting in a five to six months usage period this year. Yet the publisher and provider request payment for the entire calendar year because we "will indeed be receiving all the issues for the year" Are there any solutions out there for this version of the access vs ownership problem apart from the e-archives? Monica Hammes Academic Information Service University of Pretoria
- Prev by Date: Re: Charleston Advisor Announcement
- Next by Date: Re: manifest assent
- Prev by thread: Re: eJournals - "subscription" period
- Next by thread: Ebook Conference 2000
- Index(es):