[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: What is wrong with this picture?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: What is wrong with this picture?
- From: Rick Anderson <Rick_Anderson@uncg.edu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:19:11 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Rebecca said:
> I agree emphatically that recent
> changes in the copyright law protect only the publishers
> and distributers. As someone who has published and
> recorded, I can assure you that I won't make one more cent
> from the changes to the copyright law than I did under
> the previous copyright law <...>
I'm not sure it's a question of publishers vs. authors -- I think it would
be more accurate to say that copyright holders are the ones protected, and
the copyright holder may be either party. If you, the author, have sold
your copyright, then in theory you've already gained from it. (Whether
that's actually the case is between you and the publisher, of course --
you might give away your copyright if you expect to realize non-monetary
benefit from doing so.)
--------
Rick Anderson
Head Acquisitions Librarian
Jackson Library
UNC Greensboro
(336) 334-5281
rick_anderson@uncg.edu
"If you enjoy, you understand;
if you understand, you enjoy...
To like a football game is to
understand it in the football way."
-- Gertrude Stein
- Prev by Date: Re: eJournals - "subscription" period
- Next by Date: Re: Charleston Advisor Announcement
- Prev by thread: RE: What is wrong with this picture?
- Next by thread: Refereed Journal Publishing
- Index(es):
