[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: manifest assent
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: manifest assent
- From: Kimberly Parker <kimberly.parker@yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:31:33 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Examples I can do. The ones below are ones that I can find scrambling in my files. So some may be perfectly acceptable and others may have language that people would want to modify. No distinctions made here. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/terms.html http://www.sagepub.com/shopping/journal_online.asp#Licence http://www.blackwellpublishers.co.uk/static/online.htm#Terms ------------------------------------------------------------- Kimberly Parker Electronic Publishing and Collections Librarian Yale University Library 130 Wall Street Voice (203) 432-0067 P.O. Box 208240 Fax (203) 432-7231 New Haven, CT 06520-8240 mailto:kimberly.parker@yale.edu ------------------------------------------------------------- At 11:58 PM 6/19/00 -0400, you wrote: >Kimberly: The discussion you hoped for is not materializing. I wonder if >it could be because many readers would be helped by examples of manifest >assent-type licenses? Can you elaborate by pointing us to a few examples >of what you mean? Some consciousness-raising on this point is important. > >Not being particularly familiar with such creatures myself, I'd stick to >the caution that I give for "click" licenses and other supposedly >non-negotiable ones: Think about your situation. If you are sitting at >home in your fuzzy slippers trolling through the internet and you graze >through such e-wares and you don't read the license or don't comply with >it, the likelihood that the sheriff will knock on your door and serve you >with a subpoena is probably nil. However, if you are an employee of an >institution that represents a potential customer for the e-goods, then the >situation could be quite different. I personally think that no >institution can afford to glide by such licenses and take no action. In >fact, it would be irresponsible. > >By the way, UCITA would validate/legalize such licenses as Kimberly >describes, a reason to pay attention to such licenses -- and to fight >adoption of UCITA. Unless you live in Maryland or Virginia or any other >state where UCITA may have been enacted. In that case you might want >to fight to get it off the books. > >Ann Okerson >Yale University
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: manifest assent
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Re: manifest assent
- Prev by Date: Re: manifest assent
- Next by Date: RE: What is wrong with this picture?
- Prev by thread: Re: manifest assent
- Next by thread: Re: manifest assent
- Index(es):