[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is wrong with this picture?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: What is wrong with this picture?
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:49:33 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
More likely, they tried it and found it too slow or too expensive. Does anyone really think that publishers can possibly survive economically if they permit libraries to offer truly rapid document delivery unless it will pay them as much or more than conventional journal subscriptions? (That does not mean that a hybrid model might not prove more flexible and more generally satisfactory. But if it works well it cannot possibly be any less expensive overall.) As I and so many others have said before, the only real solution is a drastically less expensive means of producing the material in the first place. David Goodman, Princeton University Biology Library dgoodman@princeton.edu 609-258-3235 _____ On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Tom Sanders wrote: > Apparently none of them have been informed about the options of ILL or > document delivery either.
- Prev by Date: RE: What is wrong with this picture?
- Next by Date: Re: manifest assent
- Prev by thread: RE: What is wrong with this picture?
- Next by thread: RE: What is wrong with this picture?
- Index(es):