[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
manifest assent
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: manifest assent
- From: Kimberly Parker <kimberly.parker@yale.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 09:17:00 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I have a couple of questions for the group about "licenses of manifest assent" -- that is, those resources that have a "terms and conditions" statement that says in effect "if you use these resources, you are to abide by these terms and conditions" (or you are agreeing to abide by, or something like that). These are not "click-through licenses" in that there's nothing that says you have to hit a button to signify agreement -- they simply exist on the site -- sometimes in very buried locations. Having defined what I'm talking about, here are my questions. First about initiating or activating the resources that are affected by these manifest assent licenses. Second about ongoing treatment. (1) What practices do you have for activating a resource with a license of manifest assent? I've talked to librarians who ignore them completely, and don't make any effort to read, negotiate, or keep track of them. I've talked to librarians who review them, and only attempt to negotiate and get a replacement signable agreement if the manifest assent license has problem language. I've talked to librarians who won't activate any resource with a license of manifest assent and ALWAYS attempt to negotiate to replace them with a signable license even if the language is fine. (You'll see why with my next question.) (2) This is mostly to those people who fall into the middle of the above range of approaches. Obviously the first extreme has chosen to ignore them, and the final extreme has solved the problem before it can happen. If you've read manifest assent licenses and find the language acceptable, are you doing anything to keep regular tabs on the terms and conditions to make sure they don't change to something you WOULDN'T find acceptable? I really want to start discussion on a few things, here. DO we need to put a lot of effort into licenses of manifest assent, or can we safely ignore them? (I say this, realizing the recent thread on signing anything and not worrying about it.) If we waffle in the middle of ignoring them, what if anything can we do to minimize the work involved in dealing with these creatures? Any insights would be lovely. Even a lively discussion with no resolution would be fun. ------------------------------------------------------------- Kimberly Parker Electronic Publishing and Collections Librarian Yale University Library 130 Wall Street Voice (203) 432-0067 P.O. Box 208240 Fax (203) 432-7231 New Haven, CT 06520-8240 mailto:kimberly.parker@yale.edu -------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: manifest assent
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Re: manifest assent
- Prev by Date: ASA-New electronic journal announced
- Next by Date: Charleston Advisor Announcement
- Prev by thread: Re: Charleston Advisor Announcement
- Next by thread: Re: manifest assent
- Index(es):