[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- From: Rick Anderson <Rick_Anderson@uncg.edu>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:14:09 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Excellent post, Carolyn. One quibble and a note: > Contracts are written to protect the > interest of all parties. Contracts are only effective if > all parties clearly understand up front what their > responsibilities are for performance. Actually, contracts are written to protect the interests of the party writing the contract. The problem libraries face with licenses is that the contracts are written by the other party. N.B. -- I hate to sound self-promoting (again), but I've written an article arguing, as Carolyn does, that publishers may not need to impose license agreements on the sale of their products as routinely as they do, and proposing a simple model for determining when they may or may not be necessary. It's called "To License or Not to License: That Really Ought to Be the Question," and it's in the April 1999 issue of Against the Grain. If anyone would be interested in a copy, let me know and I'll fax it to you. -------- Rick Anderson Head Acquisitions Librarian Jackson Library UNC Greensboro (336) 334-5281 rick_anderson@uncg.edu "If you enjoy, you understand; if you understand, you enjoy... To like a football game is to understand it in the football way." -- Gertrude Stein
- Prev by Date: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Next by Date: We have met the enemy...
- Prev by thread: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Next by thread: RE: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Index(es):