[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- From: Keith Seitter <kseitter@ametsoc.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 18:31:49 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Let me make a few comments from the "information provider" side of the fence. Chuck Hamaker, Rick Anderson, and others make some good points. I think all of us are spending more time on license agreements than we want to and I doubt that any of us expected to be learning as much contract law as we have been forced to do over the past few years. (And I worry that lawyer fees on both sides are using funds better spent on getting things into the patrons' hands.) The license agreement we wrote for our journals online makes an effort to be as "library friendly" as possible, but we still find ourselves in negotiations with some institutions as a result of state laws or institutional standard practices that do not quite match our license agreement. When working with a library to come to a mutually acceptable agreement, I try to keep the following points in mind and make them clear to whoever is negotiating for the library: 1) The LAST thing we want is to have to go to court over this agreement. Any subscriber can rest assured that, regardless of the precise language of the agreement, we would truly exhaust all avenues to resolve a conflict over the subscription informally before reverting to formal action. 2) We need to have enough uniformity in the licenses that we have with our subscribers that we can effectively manage and abide by them collectively. So, for issues such as how many days notice we will give for changes in terms (as just one example), we cannot be in a position of having some institutions at 30 days, some at 60, some at 90, etc., or we will surely be remiss for some of them some of the time. Our intention would always be to provide as much notice as possible, but we cannot get into the situation of having to administratively handle groups of subscribers differently because of variations in the individual license agreements. That would simply increase our costs and that doesn't serve the library or us as we work toward keeping our fees as low as possible. 3) There are several sorts of changes that we can accept easily and without the need to have our attorneys get involved. These include things like changing the state of venue, for which our lawyers have instructed us to accept any reasonable suggestion but to not strike the clause entirely. I think the most important point related to some of the recent discussion on this list is (1) above. As a nonprofit society publisher our mission is the dissemination of research results. We view the libraries subscribing to our journals in print and online as partners in fulfilling this mission. We are not trying to put onerous conditions on their use of our journals and we expect them to respect our need for a license that reasonably protects the investment we are making in producing the journals as well as protecting the intellectual property of the authors who publish in them. The license agreement sets conditions for both of us (for example, under the license we are bound by it to provide perpetual access to the journals online), and I think it should be viewed as outlining our partnership in dissemination. Some level of trust is required on both sides, because without it the license would have to be several times as long and much more prescriptive than would be useful to any of us. If we both assume that we would go to great lengths to avoid a formal legal battle, then the negotiation process becomes a more reasonable task of coming up with simple language that we both agree fulfills our needs. While I have learned (mostly through this list) how very differently some publishers approach this issue, I know that there are a number of publishers who are just as concerned about improving and simplifying the license situation as the librarians are. Keith Seitter ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Keith L. Seitter phone: 617-227-2426 ext. 220 Deputy Executive Director fax: 617-742-8718 American Meteorological Society e-mail: kseitter@ametsoc.org 45 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108-3693 http://www.ametsoc.org/AMS ----------------------------------------------------------------
- Prev by Date: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Next by Date: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Prev by thread: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Next by thread: Re: Negotiate or sign? (Was: "Confused")
- Index(es):