[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: BioMed Central Authors to retain copyright
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: BioMed Central Authors to retain copyright
- From: "T. Scott Plutchak" <TSCOTT@lister2.lhl.uab.edu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 17:48:17 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In my case, as someone who buys the stuff (at a rate of about $1,000,000/year), the money comes straight out of state tax dollars -- the same pool out of which we pay faculty salaries. So, tax revenue (either state for salaries or federal for research) pays the faculty to write the stuff, they send it off to the journals (often paying page charges for the privilege) and then more tax revenue pays to buy it back. And when the faculty fuss (legitimately) about their salaries, the money comes right out of the library budget. So in that sense, the money to pay for the publications _does_ come from research grants and faculty salaries. T. Scott Plutchak Director, Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences Associate Director, Academic Programs Information Technology University of Alabama at Birmingham tscott@uab.edu http://www.uab.edu/lister -----Original Message----- From: Rick Anderson [mailto:Rick_Anderson@uncg.edu] To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: BioMed Central Authors to retain copyright > The money spent for academic journals and books does not pay for the > creation of the information--research grants and faculty > salaries do that. Well, yes... but once the information is created, it still costs money to publish and distribute it. That money comes from those who pay for the publications or who underwrite them through advertising, not (in most cases) from research grants and faculty salaries. And when it comes to non-academic writing (which forms an essential part of any liberal arts collection), copyright protection is essential to the creation process itself. > The lack of copyright protection would hinder no academic author; This may become true at some point in the future, but it is most certainly not true now. Copyright protection is enormously important to academic authors -- not so much because it protects our individual rights (as I observed earlier), but because it makes possible the publishing infrastructure that currently exists and on which we rely as academics. As a tenure-seeking librarian, I must have publishers to assist me in my career path by publishing and distributing what I write. Yes, I care about whether publishers make money -- not out of some altruistic concern for their individual "lifestyles," but out of a desire for them to keep existing so that they can publish what I write. In the long run we may not need them. But most of us are up for tenure in the short run. -------- Rick Anderson Head Acquisitions Librarian Jackson Library UNC Greensboro (336) 334-5281 rick_anderson@uncg.edu
- Prev by Date: Internet vs. Publishing (Re: BioMed Central Authors to retain copyright)
- Next by Date: licenses to review
- Prev by thread: Re: BioMed Central Authors to retain copyright
- Next by thread: ebook survey responses
- Index(es):