[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Control of concurrent users
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Control of concurrent users
- From: "Diane Frake" <DFRAKE@vermontlaw.edu>
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 10:03:23 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Ros, it certainly is impossible to enforce this clause. What is "reasonable"? You always have the option of crossing out an offending provision or �sking the publisher to take it out. Watch out for those indemnity clauses!....... Diane Frake Associate Director Julien and Virginia Cornell Library vermont Law School _____ >>> M.R.Doig@derby.ac.uk 03/23/00 10:47PM >>> Dear All With reference to my query of a few weeks ago, there is a clause in the license in question which states 'subscriber shall use all reasonable endeavours to restrict and control all use of the data bases.' Unfortunately it seems that the supplier of the database cannot themselves control the number of users! We here cannot control numbers of concurrent users on web-based databases etc. We have several hundred PCs on 5 sites!! I feel the onus is on suppliers to restrict use, not ourselves. It would also seem to make a mockery of their clause which allows them to audit use. If they can't control the users , audit would be difficult especially at a distance. Since we only really want one user but the minimum is three , we find the supplier's solution to charge us double for unlimited access totally unacceptable. Has anyone else come across this kind of thing and how did you deal with it? I certainly can't sign the licence if control is our responsibility. Thanks in advance for any advice. Ros Doig Serials and Interlending Librarian University of Derby Kedleston Rd Derby DE22 1GB Tel. 01332 622222 Ext.1204 Fax. 01332 622767 Email. M.R.Doig@Derby.ac.uk
- Prev by Date: Re: Control of concurrent users
- Next by Date: Developing an online and e-commerce strategy?
- Prev by thread: Re: Control of concurrent users
- Next by thread: Re: Control of concurrent users
- Index(es):